SCRUM, Kanban, Scrumban
Table of contents
When which framework makes sense – including advantages and disadvantages
Agility is no longer a buzzword – it's everyday life in most software agencies. However, “working agile” does not automatically mean “doing SCRUM”. Depending on the team, project size, and customer structure, SCRUM can be overwhelming, Kanban underwhelming – or Scrumban just right. This article explains the three frameworks concisely – and shows what really matters in agency projects.
🌀 SCRUM – the Structured Framework
SCRUM is a process-driven, role-based framework with clearly defined rules, artifacts, and events. It is particularly suitable for cross-functional teams that work long-term on a product – such as internal software, platforms, or recurring development projects.
📋 Kanban – the flexible flow model
Kanban is lightweight, visually controlled, and ideal for agencies with high reactivity – for example, when many small customer projects or ad-hoc requests are running in parallel.
🔄 Scrumban – the best of both worlds?
Scrumban combines the structure of SCRUM with the flexibility of Kanban – and is the most realistic solution in many agencies.
🧠 Conclusion: Agile is what works for you
Agility in agencies requires practical applicability instead of dogmatism.
Whether SCRUM, Kanban, or Scrumban – the most important thing is: transparency, communication, and a shared understanding of progress.
Those who find the right framework for their reality – and consciously adapt it – not only work more agile but also more satisfied.